Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'd just like to say that I think the statements made by Jean Crowder, in respect of the status of the current agreement, were made with rose-coloured glasses on. I would also like to say, at the same time, that all of our statements have been consistent in stating that we'll ensure that the students are looked after.
I think we have to recognize that First Nations University has had declining enrolment. People have obviously been voting with their feet.
I have a concern about the motion from the perspective that it limits witnesses. I would say that the motion would be much more appropriate if we were to talk to people such as the chief financial officer and others who are familiar with what has really occurred in this circumstance. We need a realistic look at the circumstances of the situation.
I have another concern, which is process oriented. This committee has only so many meetings. We have a work plan. We've also had every indication that we're going to have some significant legislation. I think we keep entertaining these shorter looks at things. Generally, we've done it with consensus, but I believe that we're at a state now that if we're going to look at this before March 31, we should not do it during our regular proceedings on Tuesday and Thursday from 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. If we're really committed to this, then I think we ought to be able to sit outside of our regular committee time. If we're not prepared to do that, then I'm prepared to say that we're not really committed to the exercise.
Those are my comments at this time.