I listened carefully to what Justice Berger said about languages, and I think he is right. It is important that Inuktitut be taught in communities. Should they teach English, French and Inuktitut? That is a political decision, but I think that, in certain places, Inuktitut should be taught in schools first and foremost. Then another language should be taught, one that is chosen by the people in question, in the areas in question. In northern Quebec, French, English and Inuktitut are taught, but it could be different elsewhere.
I agree with you that education should be available in Inuktitut and that we should make it a priority if we want the people to be involved in the development. I think our recommendations will touch on that.
Furthermore, I am worried. I read Mr. Quin's brief, which was translated into French, carefully. I took notes. I really like recommendation 7, but could you tell me why we cannot remove Ottawa from the process? In fact, that could be one of our recommendations, but it appears that the federal government has decided to embed itself in the north to assert Canada's sovereignty in the Arctic. That creates a problem in terms of your recommendation. So you should resign yourself to that fact. I am not sure what your take on that is, but Ottawa does not appear to want to remove itself from all the projects, quite the opposite.
In addition, the government has established CanNor. I am not sure if you are aware, but CanNor is the agency that is going to manage all that. So what is your take on that, as an expert in mine development?