I actually hold the exact opposite view. I totally disagree. I think we're too early. I agree totally with the preamble of the motion. Obviously, the witness provided all sorts of very serious problems. All sorts of them, as he said, didn't know what the programs involved. The Sealift only occurs once a year. You need a year's advance planning.
I would maybe ask the mover of the motion.... I find it a little strange, timing-wise, when we are the midst of a report. We've heard a whole bunch of witnesses. We're going to come up with what I hope are very serious recommendations, because there were a lot of problems, so why would we do a one-off recommendation before the report is produced?
I'm curious. Maybe the member could answer why--we are going to have a report, probably in the next couple of weeks, I assume--we would make only one recommendation independent of the report.