Chief Twinn, this will be a bit of a lengthy introduction to a question, but I'm going to try to get through it as best I can.
Mr. Calla spoke earlier about being functional in the mainstream economy and how Bill C-27 addresses this.
There are two things. There's the Montana decision and your own decision regarding—I'll just go into it briefly:
...confidentiality of financial statements is protected because they are often consolidated statements that contain reports on private businesses owned by First Nations.
I think, Mr. Calla, you were referring to those just little while ago:
In that case, the Court held that audited financial statements, in particular statements dealing with band generated revenues, provided to the government under the Indian Act constituted confidential information within the meaning of paragraph of 20(1)(b) of the Access to Information Act and therefore need not be disclosed to the public.
I guess you know what I'm getting at. What kind of a situation does Bill C-27 put you in as far as the sensitivities outlined here vis-à-vis privacy?