In the language selections we made for drafting the bill and the mechanisms and structure of the bill, obviously clarity was one of the fundamental goals that we were seeking. The choices that we made in those regards, we think, it's the government's view, are the clearest way of expressing the thoughts and requirements of the land claim and the bill itself.
As I said earlier in my response, there were differences of opinion on the language and the drafting, but our view is that the language and drafting of the bill itself is the preferable language and drafting and the clearest way of expressing the concept.