Thank you.
Thank you for the brief. It has been very helpful, even in previous hearings. So thank you, even though we're getting you at the end of this.
I guess all of us have been quite concerned that even the language of your brief is pretty strong language. For example:The CBA Section does not support the proposed repeal of sections 42 to 47 of the Indian Act. Significant mischief and hardship will occur if Section 7 of Bill c-428 is enacted....
I think it speaks to what my colleague said, that somehow we need to persuade the committee that the right thing to do is to vote no to that clause, with the provision that you and others would perhaps work with the member for a companion bill that could come forward in due course to deal with the complexity of this wills and estates piece, and to ensure that there's no void and that the problems you've articulated are dealt with in a comprehensive way.
Is that your advice to this committee?