Well, that's what I'm pointing to: the simple addition of a preamble that focuses on the water safety plan approach. And then amongst the regulatory options that are outlined—because it is broadly enabling—I point out that this broad framework should be reflected throughout any options that are adopted.
That, I think, would be true to what the expert panel heard and wrote in our report. We were afraid of simply imposing a detailed regulatory structure with “meet these numbers or go to jail” and nothing else. Well, Bill S-8 isn't that, but the criticism is.
What else is it? It could be effective in the sense that it enables a whole bunch of things to happen, but it doesn't have the guiding principles, and that's what I'm advocating.