Thank you very much.
Thanks to all of you for coming today. You have to bear with us: it's a steep learning curve for some of us. I may know a little bit more about the social determinants of health, but this is new.
However, I was very impressed with the briefing on the EU marine region, mainly because of the agreement on the shared territory in terms of traditional hunting and fishing and the fact that it was actually carved out and designated as such with a co-management plan, and it seems to be a pretty straightforward agreement.
Therefore, I was concerned about the Yale treaty. It is sort of what you were saying at the end, Patrick, in terms of the Goldilocks of your job: too hot, too cold, too fast, too slow. It is rarely just right for people on all sides. I was concerned to hear that the Stó:lo people are feeling that their traditional hunting and fishing rights have not been honoured, that there hasn't been a carve-out, and that they're worried they would need to have permits from one band to carry out what they've been doing for 10,000 years.
I would like to know the process for these areas that are contentious. What does it take for you to green-light a treaty when there's such objection? It sounds as if there are probably one or two or three amendments to the Yale agreement that could make it work. It's not about stopping it; it's a matter of actually finding those accommodations.