Thanks, Ryan.
I'm not going to get into the comments that were.... I think Daryn spoke.... Well, I'm not going to speak to that stuff.
Generally, what we have demonstrated here is a concern for the processes and the ways the agreements are interpreted. When we get into the discussion about consultation, it is not just, “Here's the information”; I think you have to look more deeply. That's why we speak to the concept of deep consultation. It's about a dialogue.
The agreements say that there should be sufficient form and notice of the issue to be consulted on, sufficient time to respond, full and fair consideration of the response. What we're trying to demonstrate through this discussion is that these didn't occur, and that is the treaty. The treaty is about that relationship and being able to do that.
Would I say this is consistent with it? No.