Thank you very much.
I just want to follow up a little bit about consultation in general. I hope not to come across as being cynical.
Sometimes it seems that some groups may feel that, if they didn't get what they wanted as a result of the consultation, the consultation wasn't actually there or wasn't sufficient. Do you get that sense, or are there some shortcomings in our duty to consult?
You can speak to this agreement. Are there some shortcomings? Do you feel we've done it as our duty dictates?
Certainly consultation must be more sincere and meaningful than just a token going through the motions, but at the same time I doubt it can mean that we have to have unanimous agreement.