Actually, I don't think I used the expression “social licence”. I think I talked about meaningful engagement in first nations communities, which I believe is essential to moving forward.
I'm not going to comment on individual projects.
Getting back to your question, I'm happy to comment on the reasons that Shell has given for cancelling or putting a project on hold. Regulatory reform, regulatory certainty and predictability is absolutely essential. It's essential for Canada. That's why we are taking that responsibility seriously. It's unfortunate that over the last number of years we have not been able to get approval for major infrastructure projects. One of the reasons we have not been able to get approval is because—