The only thing I was going to say is that I submitted to this committee a commentary on Mr. Isaac's and Mr. Hoekstra's work, and I dealt with that question. First of all, you'll see in there that his arithmetic was wrong, and even if you accept it, one should look at how states with indigenous peoples voted. It was actually 57, not 42, out of 88, and so he was wrong there.
As Jennifer said, if the world has now reaffirmed the UN declaration eight times by consensus at the General Assembly, what is the difference between that and what happened when four states later changed their vote? It doesn't make sense. The fact that it has been reaffirmed eight times by consensus says that if the whole world can do this, there must be something valuable in it.
Thank you.
