On a larger-scale infrastructure side, the last speaker referenced current ice roads and bridges to feed those three diamond mines that we have. Those are based on a winter road that has been in place. It's a pretty impressive feat that goes on every year to move in all the products over a six- to eight-week period to supply and resupply those three mines. That is increasingly at risk as it relates to the climate change we're experiencing.
When you look at some of that key infrastructure, for us to maintain some of that socio-economic status, we need to look at things like the Mackenzie Valley and the Slave geological corridor, which is proposed to extend beyond into Nunavut, with port access, as well as some of the key infrastructure requirements around energy.
One of the major constraints that we experience here in NWT and across the three territories is that there is a very, very high cost of power generation. We're capped in terms of the hydroelectric output that we produce, and there is an increasing cost as it relates to diesel cogeneration. We have to look at opportunities so that we can drive in a cheaper electrical supply.
From an economic standpoint, if we don't have some of that key infrastructure.... We have some significant downward pressure as it relates to NWT in particular. You probably saw the Conference Board of Canada report that came out about six months ago. My understanding is that a revised one is coming out today or tomorrow. We haven't had a chance to look at that. Every indication is that we have some very weak economic prospects as it relates to the territory here.
Look at those three diamond mines. They contribute about $1.2 billion to the territorial economy here. If we're not able to sustain those mines and to produce other revenue-generating opportunities as they relate to the resource sector, there is a significant threat to the economic prosperity that not only the Yellowknives Dene First Nation and our corporation experience, because we're only one of many that positively contribute to that sector.
Along with that would come some pretty negative things, such as population decline, obviously a loss of meaningful job opportunities and a loss of the ability to provide social programming across the territory.
Paul and I were talking earlier about programming and the next steps in what we would require. We really need to have a joint effort as it relates to the federal government, the territorial government, and the impact on indigenous groups in the territory. When you look at a billion-dollar project—the Slave geological one, let's say, or hydro upgrades—in southern jurisdictions that may not be an overly large project. In a jurisdiction like NWT, Yukon or Nunavut, these are megaprojects.
We have constraints as they relate to the territorial government. The GNWT in particular is bumping up against their debt cap. Also, from an indigenous standpoint, our ability to contribute meaningfully from a capital standpoint is going to have its constraints
At a very high level for a recommendation, we're saying that the federal government needs to look at these resource projects with that risk capital and at investing for future opportunities to continue development, whether it be the resource project, Arctic sovereignty or the ability to reach some of these northern remote communities. It's very difficult for us to develop a business case that's going to support that.
The other side of it is to look at how we engage with the indigenous communities so that they can have a meaningful contribution. I think there are opportunities when we're contributing federal dollars into resource projects. Do we have the ability to convert more of that into equity positions so that the first nation has the ability to then leverage and work with third party financiers?
Is there anything you want to add to that, Paul?