I'm sure you're aware of some recent testimony by a doctor who was here at committee. Also, the APTN did a bit of a series on the non-insured health benefits.
What strikes me, if you look perhaps at the federal service plan, is that it's pretty seamless. For orthodontic work, the dentist might flip a picture in, and the approval comes very quickly. To my knowledge, I don't know of any declines in orthodontic services for people under, say, the public sector plan. So it seems that there are plans out there that are seamless and very burden-free in terms of their paperwork and process. In comparison to the stories that we've heard, that is an issue. You talked about working with the AFN in a review of non-insured health benefits. Are you looking at your systems and processes for a more seamless provision of service, which is the norm? That's the first question.
The second part of that—and then I hope to talk about primary care—is that we heard that the formulary is very restricted. I would like to know if your formulary compares to what is routinely available, for example, in the province of Ontario.