I've seen things in that draft that I agree with. It confirms that in the preamble there's an actual commitment, not just a recognition. It's funny because your language bill actually has a commitment to equitable, sustainable funding, and I think there should be the same commitment here.
Then I believe in clause 20, per your notes, basically it is drafted such that it does still permit fiscal discussions to happen in the context of these co-operative or collaborative agreements. However, the buck stops.
There's a provision that says, notwithstanding anything else in the act, and irrespective of whether an indigenous governing body has entered into a coordination agreement, the minister at all times shall fund the costs associated with child welfare services. It sets out various areas. There's the actual delivery of services, becoming self-governing—so developing to have that capacity—and then the actual self-governing.
I would agree that those are fundamental to this actually being at all effective.