With respect to Nishnawbe Aski Nation, we've been diligently working with ISC as well developing what's called a remoteness quotient through the work of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal that looks at the actual costs of remoteness.
As you know, in the Nishnawbe Aski Nation, we represent 49 communities. Thirty-four of them are fly-in, so there are extreme challenges for our children, youth and families to access services. Those are some of the areas that we've advocated for and worked on with ISC with respect to the Human Rights Tribunal to look at access to services, the time it takes our children to access many of those services that are enjoyed by other Canadians. We want it to be equitable as well. We're still working with Indigenous Services Canada through the tribunal process to really look at that and give empirical evidence of needs-based funding for our child and family service programs. I think that's a step in the right direction to really look at some of the funding options.
In terms of implementation, resources need to be attached to an implementation plan to look at those things asserting our jurisdiction, looking at our unique position of remoteness and taking that into consideration. There needs to be a level of implementation and resources attached as well when we're moving ahead to determining the best pathway to asserting our inherent jurisdiction over child and family services.