I'll start with a response, and then my colleagues at INAC perhaps can chime in as well.
Indeed, actually, we do have a number of frameworks and strategies. Those are limited in scope at the moment. For example, we have the national aboriginal youth suicide prevention strategy. That strategy is limited in scope because it only deals with prevention: primary prevention, secondary prevention, and tertiary prevention.
As you said, there are many upstream items that are not covered, such as, education, culture, etc. All of those need to be built onto this pre-existing national aboriginal youth suicide prevention strategy in order to make it a comprehensive strategy, because one cannot go with a health-only approach. One needs to deal with all of the other socio-cultural factors, housing, etc. For that, we are absolutely very interested in working with any sectors who are interested.
On the issue of working with indigenous organizations, we've been working very closely with the AFN, as well as with ITK. We worked with the AFN on co-developing the framework for the first nations suicide prevention and continuum framework. For the Inuit, we work with ITK to assist them in developing their suicide prevention strategy, as well as the mental wellness continuum framework.
We have regular meetings with those organizations, those national organizations, learning from them and offering any assistance we can to them so that together we can actually help address this very complex problem. We have been hearing from our AFN and ITK partners that they are very interested—