I'd like to go back to where you started. That was the first part which was the length of time pertinent to the 15-year review because in the negotiations for the treaty that was one of the critical issues, and we delved into it. Maa-nulth proposed initially that the review happen every 10 years. Governments were reluctant, as Chief Cootes said, particularly the former federal government, because we were simply looking to reopen the negotiations every 10 years.
There were two pieces to it. We had thought 10 years was an appropriate amount of time. The timing was tied, in part, to the acquisition of adequate data about whether the treaty was working or not. One of the issues that came up was that 10 years wasn't going to be enough time, so we wouldn't know after 10 years, so they pushed hard, and eventually we moved it from 10 to 15 years.