Of course it's about money. One of the problems I had in the settlement of the last claim was that, according to the requirement of the day, when you take this to a vote you also have to vote on whether to accept the negotiation process. Also, there is the trust situation and how it's set up. In the trust situation, it's outlined if there's going to be a payment to the membership. So it becomes a question of whether you're really voting in favour of the settlement or whether you're voting for it just because you need the money. That's a terrible thing to have to take to the community in that way. There has to be a way to separate that out in the process.
The money aspect I think is important, but what is also important are the ties we once had with the land and the waters, and that connection still has to play a role in how we figure this out.