I want to continue on in relation to a comment that I found really illustrative, and I want to invite you to go further in that area. In that 2015 submission, you comment on “scorched earth” procedural tactics. You went into this theme just a moment ago, how the federal government in the past has, in your opinion, taken advantage of technical defences and used dilatory approaches to the specific claims, and how oftentimes they have just skipped going to a tribunal and gone to court instead.
I wonder if you could go into specific detail around what kinds of tough legal practices you have seen and maybe paint the picture for us.