That's a very good point.
I've surveyed a number of my colleagues, and they described oftentimes the relationship with non-insured health benefits as adversarial.
When I look at the provincial system, for example, the system has a ministry in Ontario and has a Ministry of Health transportation grant. For example, if you live in a small town in Ontario and you don't have access to that particular service or diagnostic test, you have a government program that operates provincially that essentially helps fund your travel there.
When I compare those two forms, the Ministry of Health travel grant versus the non-insured form, there are stark differences. First things first, the Ministry of Health travel grant does not ask for a diagnosis. Non-insured insists on a diagnosis, a reason for visits. Why? Why does non-insured health benefits need to know why a person is getting an MRI? Isn't that confidential between that patient and their physician? There's no mention of that in the provincial health travel grant. You simply sign as a physician and say that this person has an appointment with the specialist, and the same thing applies to escorts. Why? Why does non-insured have to know why a person requires an escort? Isn't that between patients and their clinician?
The problem is that non-insured is trying to insert itself in the doctor-patient relationship inappropriately, and that needs to stop. It needs to stop inserting itself in that doctor-patient relationship. Oftentimes my colleagues and I feel we're being “policed” by non-insured health benefits, but that is not their role.
The same thing applies when you look at the process by which they approve medication. It's archaic. It's time-consuming. It introduces unnecessary delays and it does not meet its goal of ensuring that patients get the right medication in the right time.
In the provincial system, you have a three-letter code that you write on the prescription. You go and you get your medication that day. For the non-insured system for the same medication, a piece of paper gets generated in Ottawa, and it's back-and-forth faxes between the physician and Ottawa to decide on whether or not that medication is.... Why are both systems so different?
I've spoken to people about this before, and they say, “Well, you know what, Dr. Kirlew? It's just different.” It's not different; it's inferior. There's one system that you have—