First, I'll just quickly clarify that the tripartite conversations are where there are land issues in play. Not all of the tables are not necessarily tripartite. It just depends on the subject matter.
I'm not sure we would frame the discussions we're having in a “duty to accommodate” frame. That's not really the basis on which we're having the dialogue. It's trying to figure out what's the appropriate land base necessary for a viable, self-sustaining indigenous government and community and how you build what's going to be needed for the base of an economy. That's more the outcome that I think we're trying to get to. Again, I wouldn't say that we have that perfect in any way, shape, or form, I think we know there are problems there, but that is where we're trying to get to.