I'm not sure if a specific article in the declaration speaks to it. I'm sure others in the room probably know that off the top of their head, but I'd have to look through to see it.
Certainly in the approach that we're taking, both in the negotiation processes, but also in how we're trying to do some transformations around how we deal with specific claims and the claims issues, we are very much trying to make more space in order to be able to take into account oral tradition and how that has a way of shaping how we need to view both concepts of territory as well as traditional rights that were being exercised and how they were being exercised.
I think you have space created by the courts. Certainly, the specific claims tribunal has created space for receiving oral history as evidence and giving it weight and credence. Within our processes, we are trying to build in more and more of that. Again, that is all part of trying to have an approach that is based more on recognition, where you're trying to move away from traditional forms of evidence as being a basis on which to make a decision, and instead trying to talk about it more from a relationship perspective to get a better understanding from an indigenous group about how they perceive it, how they see it, and what they're basing it on. I think you see more and more of that happening in all different facets of government, even in the ways we are talking about how traditional knowledge gets taken into account in scientific-based processes, like management of the fishery.
More and more, we have these spaces that are being created that are trying to recognize that there is a very valuable contribution to our understanding of the country that comes out of those oral traditions. We need to make the space for them and be able to incorporate them.