If one is to understand what free, prior, and informed consent means in the context of indigenous peoples in this country, one needs to read that report. Our justice system is independent and impartial. It can make reference to any source, including Pam Palmater. If, for Pam, consent means no, then the court can quote her on that. They're free to do that. That's how our legal system works.
I would also like to know what has changed since the election of this new government in terms of our relations with indigenous peoples and their rights and interests. I appreciate Dominique adding the concept of interests in that discussion, because it's not only rights—it includes the interests of indigenous peoples. How soon did the shift in your different departments come, once this government was elected?