The TRC recommendation had specific wording for the citizenship ceremony oath. The current bill that's before us does not reflect that wording directly. Your recommendation is different again.
Was there an issue with the TRC discussions when they were drafting that wording? I know we had the people from the TRC here, and they said that it was more of a suggestion than definitive. Were you at all involved in that discussion with the TRC and how they came to their wording?