I'm certainly happy to respond to that because, as you well know, one of the issues that we're dealing with as we try to move away from this deeply colonial era of Canada's Indian Act, aided by the declaration, is that the rights of indigenous people and indigenous governments can.... The rights holders select the governments and they must be able to do that. We've been seeing that revitalization in British Columbia in particular, where hereditary leaders have been able to move forward and enter into agreements and so forth.
The question is, what government do they work with? It has to be the government supported by the indigenous people, not the government picked in the colonial way.
We are in a transition process. The challenge we have is if you have a proponent of a project and that proponent has engaged one or two indigenous people and says that this is appropriate license from indigenous people to go forward, you will have a problem. You must properly engage with the rights-holders and title-holders and their government. This is where much of the work of industry and government has fallen down. This declaration act and the shifts it will bring will bring greater clarity to that process.
Even just getting the support of an Indian Act band, for example, may not deal with all of the rights-holders and title-holders in an area where traditional territory is held by an indigenous people. The declaration act provides support here. The declaration itself provides a new framework that can help reduce some of that conflict and operationalize these principles better, both for business and for government.