There are a couple of things. As the national chief said in his submission today, we would first of all correct it to say “purposes” of the act. There are two, not one, so there is an error there. We're hoping that through your work as a committee some of these issues might be able to be corrected.
In terms of the comment you made, though, about how this will impact existing jurisprudence and so forth, I think it's very clear that this will bring greater assistance to understanding some of these key areas. That's particularly where there's been a flashpoint, where there's been a denial of the rights of indigenous people. It doesn't push aside all the jurisprudence. It simply doesn't do that. The declaration being implemented brings into the discussion the article's rights and standards in the declaration.
Therefore, it isn't quite legally as you suggested. Legally, what happens—