Our position doesn't include specific revisions to the timeline, but I think the points you raise are very well taken. Government does need time, but it certainly seems, in all of the processes that I've been involved in or am privy to, that it's always a rush at the end. Many times, a three-year window ends up being a six-month work plan. Whether it's a piece of legislation or a specific amendment to a program, government is famous for not doing things unless it is under a very strict timeline, and I'm talking about any department at any time.
If the time frame is moved and is moved closer, that also, hopefully, would indicate goodwill and the ability to see this as the priority that it is.