Thank you for the question. I will start on a conceptual level and then I'll allow Tania to speak specifically to some of the considerations within the proposed amendment.
The legislation as it stands is quite broad. The creation of an action plan has great potential, but it also is so broad that it doesn't necessarily give us the confidence that an action plan alone will allow for recourse or allow for remedy to happen in places where indigenous peoples' human rights or classes of human rights for indigenous peoples have been violated in this country.
There's an existing human rights regime in this country, but I think we can all agree that historically it has done a very poor job of hearing, understanding and then ruling on indigenous peoples' human rights violations. The ability of this bill to change the landscape in this country for indigenous peoples is largely dependent upon the ability of an individual indigenous person or a group of indigenous peoples to find a way to have recourse for active violations of human rights. This particular commission that we have been lobbying for since 2017 would aid and abet that particular process to ensure that Canada actually does change and that there is a place where indigenous peoples can go other than the existing human rights tribunals that would have expertise within this particular area or field, and would allow for meaningful solutions to the outstanding challenges we have around human rights violations against indigenous peoples.
Tania, would you like to add any comments?