I appreciate very much the discussion, because we're trying to make sure that the bill is properly brought forward in terms of all of the protocols, precedents and practices of the parliamentary procedure. I was convinced that there had been substantive change within the bill that led to the preamble, but in the case of this BQ-3, I didn't see it.
My view is that the amendment is inadmissible, and I will stand by that opinion. Thanks, Madame Gill, for the discussion.
Now, that brings us to the preamble and—