In part, Patrick, it ties directly into that comment.
I think the comment I made is one that is important for someone in my position and in the positions that we all hold to realize: the reality of our history, which is that our relationship is based in land and has been broken by, at times, the theft of land and the dispossession of land through other means, and the injustice that created. In the corresponding legal remedies that are being exercised today in court, more often than not the facts are not in Canada's favour, and that has resulted in very large monetary compensations.
The amounts you see in the estimates are ones that are coming to fruition. Out of respect for the communities in question, one of which is in Alberta, there are a few very large ones on the horizon, thanks to the engagement of the community foremost in getting it done. Often, there are situations where land cannot be restored because there are people on it, and despite what you've often heard about things, there is a desire by indigenous communities and non-indigenous communities to get along, and there are some very good partnerships. No one is asking anyone to go anywhere. People are just asking to get along and to achieve justice. That includes restoration of land and, where that is not possible, monetary funds to the extent that it can substitute for that adequately.
As I look to my department for more innovative solutions, including direct negotiations with provinces for better access to lands on a treaty land entitlement basis, mostly in the prairies, this is work that needs to continue, but to the extent that we can't replace with land or where that's not desirable, it's compensation, as I mentioned in my introductory comments, through monetary reparations and restorative justice.