Thank you for the comment and the question.
I'll begin by saying that there is this unique relationship between the federal government and first nation communities, which is entrenched within not only the treaties but also the Canadian Constitution. There is a commitment the federal government has to first nation communities. I would even say it's about infrastructure, as the federal government is also engaged in infrastructure. I don't think the fiduciary responsibility to first nations people should ever be eliminated or go away because of all those constitutional and legislative agreements.
For first nations people, there's a shortfall. This is what the grand chief mentioned. There isn't economic parity. For indigenous governments and businesses, there is this continuous seeking of resources or financial revenue to make up for that shortfall.
An example we have is our northern campus. It's in a very old building. It's situated near a safe injection site. The City of Prince Albert gave us five acres of land for five dollars in an amazing location, so we submitted a $25-million proposal to the federal green and inclusive community buildings program. We had the land, a detailed schematic and community engagement. As I said, education is the solution for many of the issues we engage in. However, we didn't get the grant, and we didn't get a reason for the grant being rejected.
Now we have, like Prince Albert Grand Council and FSIN—the Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations—this challenge. This has been a 30-year issue in that location in Prince Albert, so we are looking—