I appreciate that.
To go back to the definition of the water protection zone, in my last round, we confirmed that the minister could, theoretically, make decisions on defining that zone without the consent of the first nation and/or a relevant province or territory. It does seem problematic to me that that is the case.
Are there discussions or any desire on the part of the department to solidify that into a more specific agreement to ensure that there is consent from each of those three parties before such a zone could be defined?