May I just go back to the previous question?
There are a couple of defining terms on first nations governing bodies and first nations lands in the earlier sections that might provide some further light to your previous point.
On the question of where there might be conflicting laws, including those with regard to resource development, those are itemized in the clause called “Limitation”, which talks about if there are conflicting laws. Should a first nation bring a law into force that may conflict with regulatory or natural resource laws that are itemized in this bill.... The limitations talk about the paramountcy of laws and which laws would prevail. This is standard practice in many pieces of legislation.
I think if the question is about where there is a conflict of laws, that's itemized in this bill as well. Is that your question?