I would have to agree with Mr. Paul on that. I think that it leaves too much ambiguity in terms of not having a clear definition on that.
I get that every piece of federal legislation has that issue. Every piece of federal legislation is not a perfect piece of legislation, but I think that when it comes to clean drinking water, the class action and all the issues that we've had with that, we have to ensure that we're not just allowing the status quo to continue. We have to ensure that there actually is a change when it comes to this.
Part of our mandate here at the federation is to pass our own pieces of regional water legislation, to govern ourselves in terms of how those processes will work.
To answer the question, I believe that it leaves that process too ambiguous, too open and with not enough clarity.
Thank you.