I think that speaks to the second two things, and I'm glad you raised that because after that it talks about “be responsive to current and projected needs with respect to infrastructure” and “be responsive to infrastructure lifecycle planning related to local needs”.
I read that as the minister working with stakeholders to say we understand that there are going to be things that we need to do, and that's in that funding allocation so we're trying to figure out how do we strengthen this.
As someone who comes from a first nation community myself, a reserve of 5,000, our goal here is to ensure that first nation communities have access to drinking water with the principles that are laid out, but we know one-size-fits-all doesn't necessarily apply to everyone. You have a rather large community and there are some communities that have less than 200 people.
How do we get to a point where we're protecting all of the needs of either the large ones or the small ones with the same wording?