I think that's where, when we're talking about funding allocations and decisions, we're on the same page. We're just saying different things but in order to achieve the same objective. I appreciate that.
Chief Diabo, you said that the clause 8 laws are contradictory towards the laws, the inherent rights, of your community and your nation. Do you think that, if an amendment was to be provided where nothing in this act would abrogate or derogate away from inherent rights or treaty rights and that this legislation would be seen as affirming section 35 inherent treaty rights, it would be enough to balance your rights, your section 35 constitutional rights in your community, by ensuring that important legislation that already speaks to water exists knowing full well that section 35 paramountcy means that your constitutional rights would be put above any kind of legislation that was currently in this legislation?