Thank you for that question, Taylor. I think it's a very important question.
I was on this committee for many years, after we were elected in 2015. I've served two different terms here. One thing that I've noted, which is very clear to me, is that, notwithstanding what happens around us, within Parliament and the precinct, this committee acts in the best interest, in most cases, of the people we are here to serve, particularly first nations, Inuit and Métis.
While we may have political differences, I am always looking forward to reaching across the aisle and working with opposition, including Jamie, Sébastien and Lori, in your case. I think the notion of reconciliation is not a partisan issue. It's not one that one party has exclusivity over. It is a collective response that lies with all of us.
This is a moment in time and history when I think we can demonstrate this bipartisan nature. The Whitecap Dakota agreement is a perfect example of where we were able to obtain consent from all the parties. In fact, the legislation passed unanimously through the House. I think we're in a moment here where that same possibility exists, notwithstanding limitations in the House with the debate.
I would implore everyone here to work together and to reach out. I'm always available to discuss things further. I think this is in our collective interest. This is what reconciliation means. This is an uncontroversial piece of legislation and one that I think we can all get behind.