Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'd like to use hockey lingo in my answer.
I believe there's been a violation, because I, too, feel that my questions haven't been answered. I don't get the impression that files moved forward or that the minister's vision was any clearer in terms of her intentions and her leadership on a number of files. That said, I wasn't necessarily in favour of bringing a question of privilege to the House of Commons. That would be like suspending a player or giving him a major penalty. It seems a bit excessive to me.
However, I think it would be entirely reasonable to invite the minister back. That's why I supported the chair's ruling. That said, on behalf of the Bloc Québécois, I will also support the motion to invite the minister back.
That will give us a chance to ask him questions, and I hope the answers will result in a clearer understanding for us and the first nations people watching us.