Thank you, Chair.
To Ms. Idlout's point, obviously this act is pertaining directly to first nations. Perhaps it's a question for our witnesses. I'm wondering whether there was a specific purpose in using the terminology “indigenous people” instead of “first nations”. It seems to me that, in the context of this bill, it would make more sense to use the term “first nations” because what we're specifically discussing is first nations clean water. Was there any specific reason that “indigenous people” was used in this clause versus “first nations”?