Absolutely, it would be historic to recognize it in domestic law.
In addition to what my colleague has mentioned, international law can be challenging to create a binding circumstance with, whereas in domestic law, it's up to the federal Parliament to ensure that it's binding, so there is that addition.
I would also just mention a couple of things. One is in relation to the implementation. Going back to another question that was asked about “in accordance with this Act,” it does provide guidance on implementation of that right, so that's one core component. In addition, with regard to all members of first nations versus “every individual”, G-1 is drafted to be inclusive of every individual on first nations lands, so it could be individuals who are not members of a first nation, as well.
Thank you.