In other words, just so I can summarize the last two points, we're now talking about guided by the spirit of a definition that perhaps is lacking here and perhaps lacking in legislation that's already passed. Nonetheless, we're talking about being guided by the spirit of something that is defined in a piece of legislation that is already the law of the land.
Tell me if I'm putting words in your mouth, but in your view, that could legitimately—and I understand where my colleagues are coming from—decrease the concern around the lack of a definition. Do I have that right?