When the protection zone is defined—and we know that we can't do that at this point because there's a collaborative process that has to happen—I suppose from a practical standpoint, I'm confused about why adjacency would have to be removed.
I don't want to put Mrs. Atwin on the spot, but if she has any comments from witnesses she wants to turn to, I would appreciate it. We're talking about source water protection zones, of course, and I'm not sure of instances where nations would be drawing water from somewhere that is not adjacent to them. I'm just curious about the practicality of that.