Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm following up on Mr. Schmale's point.
It was enacted in law and putting it in this one would then activate it, I believe. If it's activated and we have no definition, then it's going to be in the courts. We can give it some direction, or we can leave it to be dealt with by the courts. This activates that particular principle. It really does. It was passed in legislation before, but this piece of legislation would activate it.
I think that's the difference. We're talking about its having been in law in principle versus in legislation, which would activate it. That would be the challenge we have here of leaving it that way.
Maybe it's something we want to do, but then we have to understand that somebody else will have to give it a definition.