Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Indeed, to avoid line conflicts, we're proposing to incorporate elements of amendment NDP‑19 that we find interesting. It's a bit of a mix of BQ‑5 and NDP‑19 that we're proposing in the new version of BQ‑5.
Essentially, the purpose of the motion is to be consistent with the testimony heard at this committee on clause 8 of Bill C‑61.
Do you want me to give you some time to read it? You have the hard copy. That's fine.
We want to ensure that the status quo applies to the St. Lawrence Seaway, among other things, and that the parties involved apply the consultation mechanisms provided for and the implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, but we want to avoid the conclusion.
In terms of incorporating elements of NDP‑19, there really needs to be a reference to the government taking steps to consult and work with first nations. Recent agreements can cause harm to the fishing industry, whether in British Columbia, Quebec or the Maritimes. For first nations, fishing is a fundamental right, but it's being denied in many situations. In the circumstances, I find it interesting or important that this aspect be included in the bill. This is mainly because some communities weren’t consulted on Bill C‑61, or didn't see the final version that was presented to Parliament. We want this bill to be limited to the acts cited in the amendment that's being proposed here.
In short, here is the new version of amendment BQ‑5. I can read it, but I think you've already read it anyway.