Okay.
I have one more question, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Zimmer raised a very interesting point about adjacency. Of course, we talked about that at length yesterday. We removed adjacency pertaining to protection zones from this bill. If NDP-25 were to be adopted, it brings adjacency back to the table, creating an inconsistency.
Would that present any challenges in terms of harmonizing the bill? Would it become inconsistent or difficult to work with from that angle, having adjacency in this section but removed from the previous section?