Thank you so much.
First of all, I must express my observation that when the Liberals work together with the Conservatives, it's at a time when indigenous rights are being questioned.
I do, however, agree with regard to proposed subclause 15(1) that because it was submitted at a time before we had discussed adjacency and because these discussions are not static, my proposed subclause 15(1) amendment is not the greatest.
I do want to ask the experts about proposed subclauses 15(2) and 15(3).
Are there other places in the bill where proposed subclauses 15(2) and 15(3) can still be recognized, so as to ensure that the minister must take into account a first nation's current and projected water usage needs in respect of the framework under clause 27?