I appreciate that. I think that unfortunately has been a common theme. There's a lot of uncertainty in definitions here.
My follow-up point is that any of what we are talking about here in this clause could be overridden. First nations law could supersede it in the very next clause, the non-application. I think we're maybe having a discussion about something that may not even be applied anyway. We're talking about ensuring there's first nation choice and consent.
As I read the current legislation, with the non-application clause, the first nations would have that consent to essentially opt out already. Is that not correct?