Again, the only concern is just where clause 19 is being built to be the “may” part. It's ambiguous for a reason, because it's about those protection zone agreements that will be signed with communities, again, through their self-determination.
It's the same kind of argument that I'm making for a few of these, in that of course the spirit of the amendment I support, but it's just that it's adding an additional layer that potentially then removes that self-determination piece. I think that for a lot of these concerns that have rightly been brought forward by partners and by you, it's just again that those details will come out in those protection agreements, where they are in the driver's seat of what that looks like for them.
For me, any additional layers in this clause specifically I won't be supporting.