I'll reiterate from our last meeting, as I shared last time on the same point, and remind committee members that, by virtue of the amendment being ruled admissible, which it has been by virtue of its being moved, that means for the committee that what is in that amendment is in fact within scope. It is within the scope of this bill, because it has been moved.
I hope that committee members would keep that in mind as they consider the proposal Ms. Idlout has put forward to add “spiritual” to the needs of first nations that would be provided for by this bill, as well as the original amendment that would also add “economic”.